Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Environmentally concerned or just plain Wealth Redistribution?

The Govt is not interested in whether Climate Change is man made or not, they have no intention beyond wealth redistribution through unjust taxing of middle and higher income earners.


Australia's population in 2009 was 21,874,900.

There were 12,500,000 registered personal Income Tax earners in 2008/2009

1,107,000 of the registered taxpayers who earned $80,000+ a year so would be liable for the full Carbon Tax with no compensation.

They paid $86,698,150,000 in taxation for this year.

There were 11,193,000 registered taxpayers who earned less than $80,000 and therefore will be given some compensation for the Carbon Tax.

They paid $90,236,850,000 in tax for this year.

Besides what business will be forced to pay, the 1,107,000 taxpayers that earn above $80,000 a year will pay the full Carbon Tax and will be having to contribute to compensating business and the 11,193,000 taxpayers who earn less than $80,000.

These figures were collated from data available through ATO for the 2009 year.

The diagram above shows Income Tax is already the single biggest revenue for the Government and still they continue to tax us more and more.

This has to be considered ridiculous in anyone's language, especially when the Government continually emphasise the tax is aimed at the biggest polluters in the country, well personally,

I don't even smoke, but I guess I am still guilty of breathing.





Environmentally concerned or just plain Wealth Redistribution?

The Govt is not interested in whether Climate Change is man made or not, they have no intention beyond wealth redistribution through unjust taxing of middle and higher income earners.


Australia's population in 2009 was 21,874,900.

There were 12,500,000 registered personal Income Tax earners in 2008/2009

1,107,000 of the registered taxpayers who earned $80,000+ a year so would be liable for the full Carbon Tax with no compensation.

They paid $86,698,150,000 in taxation for this year.

There were 11,193,000 registered taxpayers who earned less than $80,000 and therefore will be given some compensation for the Carbon Tax.

They paid $90,236,850,000 in tax for this year.

Besides what business will be forced to pay, the 1,107,000 taxpayers that earn above $80,000 a year will pay the full Carbon Tax and will be having to contribute to compensating business and the 11,193,000 taxpayers who earn less than $80,000.

These figures were collated from data available through ATO for the 2009 year.

The diagram above shows Income Tax is already the single biggest revenue for the Government and still they continue to tax us more and more.

This has to be considered ridiculous in anyone's language, especially when the Government continually emphasise the tax is aimed at the biggest polluters in the country, well personally,

I don't even smoke, but I guess I am still guilty of breathing.





Monday, June 6, 2011

Kev's Site - Terms of Reference for Garnaut update



I GREG COMBET, Minister for Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, hereby commission Professor Ross Garnaut to update significant elements of his 2008 Garnaut Climate Change Review ('the 2008 Review'), and to report by 31 May 2011.

The review update will update elements of the Climate Change Review where:

significant changes have occurred, or the sum of expert knowledge has increased, since the original analysis for the 2008 Review was undertaken; and

where such changes or improvements in expert knowledge could have significant implications for the key findings and recommendations of the 2008 Review, such that they should be updated.

The Review Update should consider:

international developments on climate change mitigation efforts;

developments in climate change science, and understanding of climate change impacts;

previous proposals to develop a carbon price in Australia, and the ensuing public debate;
domestic and international emissions trends;

changes in low emissions technology costs and availability;

the potential for abatement within the land sector; and

developments in the Australian electricity market.

Throughout the Review Update, consultation with key stakeholders will be required to understand views and inform analysis.

A series of publicly released papers is to be prepared between November 2010 and March 2011. A final report is to be presented to the Government by 31 May 2011.

The Report will embody the independent judgments of its author.

It appears the issues in the Terms of Reference aren't really important, like India 's Carbon Pricing, USA not resigning with the Kyoto agreement and one of their states actually dismantling a similar Carbon Tax policy as being too hard on the people.

The significant developments in Climate Change science debunking the man made alarmists theory is also not only not addressed, they went as far as deciding to ignore the science??? This goes on and on, and these Terms of Reference shows Combet and Garnaut ignore the process and makes it up as they go along

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Terms of Reference for Garnaut update

I GREG COMBET, Minister for Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, hereby commission Professor Ross Garnaut to update significant elements of his 2008 Garnaut Climate Change Review ('the 2008 Review'), and to report by 31 May 2011.


The review update will update elements of the Climate Change Review where:

  • significant changes have occurred, or the sum of expert knowledge has increased, since the original analysis for the 2008 Review was undertaken; and
  • where such changes or improvements in expert knowledge could have significant implications for the key findings and recommendations of the 2008 Review, such that they should be updated.

The Review Update should consider:

  • international developments on climate change mitigation efforts;
  • developments in climate change science, and understanding of climate change impacts;
  • previous proposals to develop a carbon price in Australia, and the ensuing public debate;
  • domestic and international emissions trends;
  • changes in low emissions technology costs and availability;
  • the potential for abatement within the land sector; and
  • developments in the Australian electricity market.

Throughout the Review Update, consultation with key stakeholders will be required to understand views and inform analysis.

A series of publicly released papers is to be prepared between November 2010 and March 2011. A final report is to be presented to the Government by 31 May 2011.

The Report will embody the independent judgments of its author.

It appears the issues in the Terms of Reference aren't really important, like India 's Carbon Pricing, USA not resigning with the Kyoto agreement and one of their states actually dismantling a similar Carbon Tax policy as being too hard on the people.

The significant developments in Climate Change science debunking the man made alarmists theory is also not only not addressed, they went as far as deciding to ignore the science??? This goes on and on, and these Terms of Reference shows Combet and Garnaut ignore the process and makes it up as they go along


Kev's Site - The NBN is a waste of taxpayer money

Kev's Site - The NBN is a waste of taxpayer money

It is about time the Independents, stopped kissing up to the Government and started doing their job. Senator Xenophon started to, but he seemed to have ignored what was under his nose, they released certain info but he had almost decided to vote based on its release and not what is in the documents, and the obvious omission with regards to this Telstra deal?



The government had also agreed to a number of measures, including ongoing oversight of the NBN roll-out by a new parliamentary committee to be chaired by a lower house independent MP.

The government had provided Senator Xenophon with a briefing by NBN co boss Mike Quigley without the need for a confidentiality agreement.
This is the same Mike Quigley who was a top executive at Alcatel-Lucent between 2001 & 2006 and US regulators have fined Alcatel-Lucent $US137 million ($129 million) for paying bribes to win government contracts between 2001 and 2006. This intimates the person heading this process, he is either unable to manage a process, willing to turn a blind eye to how outcomes are achieved or is actively involved in these actions.

The Govt was claiming a saving of $5 billion Dollars due to a deal with Telstra. What they failed to explain is that Telstra would get $11.5 billion for there co-operation, to date this deal is still not finalised. This still meant a $43 billion cost for the NBN network paid by us and yet information was not being released to us because of some sort of need for confidentiality by NBN Co NBN Co is a company, but we paying for them to come in to existence??? Since when does a Govt. use $43 billion dollars of our money to roll out a Network that NBN Co will control and we are not allowed access to the full business plans, budget documents, and side deals along the way due to the information being commercial in confidence. Now contractors have screamed foul and run off, and we have discovered the need for another $20 billion, but wait there is more, it appears they will not be able to reach more than some 78% of people now?? Where is public accountability and transparent Government gone???

A $8 billion dollar reduction in the roll out cost is explained as a result of Telstra agreeing to NBN using their existing infrastructure, how generous of them?? Telstra is a business and aren't about to throw away an opportunity to make money, so what has this cost us, no-one has bothered to ask?

They then claimed there will be big savings through bundling on the NBN? We have had this for years and it does not cost us $43 billion . They have also talked about other services that will use the NBN, but these use our existing services already?

The cost of this may still be too high for many, especially when we have Broadband with speeds that are fast.

In what alternate reality do they see this as justifiable? They are rushing the roll out so we will be stuck with it and are certainly stuck with the bill that NBN Co, are relishing as they will have a Network rolled out at tax payers expense and then they will be making money from us again through ongoing usage.


It claims this will deliver a $2.4 billion gain to households through time-saving activities such as remote work and study, shopping, health, education and data activities.
Remote study occurs in a few cases already, however, it is not a solution for education. Kids study using the existing internet without issue already. We could do online shopping for almost all our needs already, and would do so if we wanted this. So basically it is around $56 billion to do what we could do now if that was what we wanted. ?

TAXPAYERS now face greater liabilities for construction delays or cost blowouts during the building of the National Broadband Network under a revamped tender process in which the government-owned NBN Co will take on more risks to keep down bidder costs for contractors, this is not acceptable in any business practice.


The Australian revealed that NBN Co will today announce the revised contract, but this comes amid a continuing tussle between unions and contractors on wage claims and working conditions that has the potential to inflate the final building costs on the project.

A 74-page document obtained by The Australian shows the unions had sought from NBN contractors a 36-hour working week, nine-day fortnight, 20-minute smokos, "crib" breaks after more than 90 minutes overtime and the chance to volunteer on development projects.

A household on the average wage spending 16 hours a week on the internet is predicted to save an average $7699 a year — or $148 a week.

That is interesting, I spend $105 per month for 16 hours a day internet use and all my phone calls also, but somehow they want me to believe I will save $148 per week ???

The maths still don't add up Mr Conroy

On top of all this is the driving force behind this Governments determined push to force the NBN down our throats, The Fabian Society of which our PM is a far Left member.

The Australian Fabians have four general aims:

1. To contribute to a renaissance of left of centre and progressive thought, by generating and disseminating ideas that are original, meet the challenge of the times, and are of high intellectual quality.

2. To contribute, by getting these ideas into the public domain, to the creation of a left of centre political culture and consensus.

3. To help create an active movement of people identifying with the left of centre and engaged in political debate.

4. To influence the ideas and policies of the Labor Party (and other parties) and Labor Governments to encourage progressive reform in practice.

Though they call theirselves a think tank, the Australian Fabians are more than this. They are based on a social and intellectual movement:

The UK Fabian Society has been a central part of democratic socialist, social-democratic and Labor tradition thoughout the 20th century in Britain, and the Australian Fabians in Australia since 1947. In their own words "Our output is thoroughly contemporary and relevant: by dint simply of who we are, it is organically connected to the history of the left.

Our goal is not merely (as by and large it is for other think tanks) to produce interesting ideas for the elite policy community. It is the promotion of socialist and progressive thought throughout society. We aim to change the intellectual climate of the Australia (and indeed of the wider world). We want to make broadly left of centre ways of thinking commonplace.

A crucial element of this, obviously, is to help such thought be translated into practice, particularly by government. Producing workable policies which manifest left of centre principles, and encouraging their consideration by the Australian Labor Party and by Labor governments, is therefore a crucial part of what we do. But it remains our aim to get left of centre ideas into the wider public domain. Our function in providing arenas for ordinary people to engage in intelligent discussion - in local societies and in conferences, schools and other meetings - is absolutely central to our purpose."
We still will be required to have the Network attached to our homes and without it we will have no internet on our PC nor will we have landlines.

MEDIA magnate Harold Mitchell and activist Jon Dee are among 20 "NBN champions" picked to spruik the benefits of the wholesale fibre network.

Broadband Minister Stephen Conroy yesterday announced the final list of promoters at the launch of the Gillard government's digital economy strategy.

Mr Dee -- who founded the activist organisations Do Something! and Planet Ark -- said that while he was a strong supporter of the NBN he did not believe the government had successfully sold the project to date.

And yet again this will cost us more to be fed on Bull s**t and kept in the dark, in regard to the truth. If this Network was needed we would not need to have it spoon fed to us!!!

Our Australian Democracy is fast disappearing and our way of life is almost lost also. The one thing this Government can not take away though is our Aussie spirit.

We must NEVER say there is nothing we can do, 'for all that is needed for evil to win, is for good people to do nothing.'

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Kev's Site - A Brave New Fantasy maybe?

Kev's Site - A Brave New Fantasy maybe?

By looking at Mr Conroy's ridiculous digital economy strategy I note the following in answer

ONE in eight Australians will be able to work from home by 2020 under an ambitious blueprint for the National Broadband Network that predicts it will save the typical family $148 a week.

If an employer is allowing you to work at home, they will not be offering the same level of pay, as you aren't available to share meetings, interviews etc. So the saving will be diminished by the drop in pay. And maternity leave will mean you can work from home seeing as they are paying you.


It also says that by the end of the decade it will common for people to visit the GP for a standard check-up without leaving their lounge room.

This is a fantasy, would you risk a doctor diagnosing you without either sighting you or being able to do tests in the surgery?? Are you prepared for an online doctor saying you probably have a cold without checking your temperature etc? Are you happy to have a doctor look at the mole on your arm without ever seeing it and feeling it? What medical insurer would touch this scheme, NONE it is fraught with danger and to introduce it is irresponsible and will end up in patient deaths.

The Gillard Government will today release its digital economy strategy which paints a picture of how it believes the NBN will change work and family life.

Introducing a Carbon Tax will already Change our work and family life, we won't have a job, and our whole internet experience will be monitored by the Government

The plan sets a target of lifting Australia into the world's top five for broadband access from today's poor ranking of 18th in the OECD.

Who cares, before this atrocious waste of money is completed, it will be obsolete. And people will find the 3G network is a better method.

It claims this will deliver a $2.4 billion gain to households through time-saving activities such as remote work and study, shopping, health, education and data activities.

I covered the remote work, remote study occurs in a few cases already,, however, it is not a solution for education. Kids study using the existing internet without issue already. We could do online shopping for almost all our needs already, and would do so if we wanted this. So basically it is around $56 billion to do what we could do now if we wanted to

A household on the average wage spending 16 hours a week on the internet is predicted to save an average $7699 a year — or $148 a week.

That is interesting, I spend $105 per month for 16 hours a day internet use and all my phone calls also, but somehow they want me to believe I will save $148 per week ???

The maths still don't add up Mr Conroy

Monday, May 30, 2011

Middle and lower income earners are insignificant to the overpaid Greens and Labor Ministers

Cornered on the fact that he wants to destroy the coal industry, Brown tried a denial. Then Uhlmann read out quotes from Brown: "Australia must urgently kick the coal habit" and the government must "commit to a plan to phase out coal exports". Brown smoothly changed tack.
Brown: "Sorry Chris, but Treasury has no intention of shutting the (coal) industry down."
Uhlmann: "No, but you do."
Brown: "No, I'm not ... "
Uhlmann: "Didn't you say, in 2007, that we have to 'kick the coal habit'?"
Brown: "No, I did not. You're looking at the Murdoch press where I said back in 2007 we should look at coal exports with a view to phasing them out down the line."
Uhlmann: "It wasn't the Murdoch press, it was a comment piece you wrote. So you want to phase out the coal industry?"

Brown: "The world is going to do that because it is causing massive economic damage through the impact of climate change."
Uhlmann: "But the simple question is, how would you replace the $50 million a year in export income that comes by way of coal, an industry that you'd shut down?"
Brown: "You go to renewables."
What Brown didn't say, but which his offsiders revealed this week, is the crippling cost of replacing coal.
These are the people with whom Julia Gillard has chosen to share power.

This is easy for The Greens to say, forgetting the issue that the MP and Senators are earning good money, at least 4 of these are professionals.

Bob Brown - TAS - Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery degree. One way or another he will not get hurt by a Carbon Tax.

Richard Di Natale - Vic - Masters in Public Health, a Masters in Health Sciences and is a Fellow of the Australian Faculty of Public Health Medicine. - Well he isn't going to be hurt with a Carbon Tax either.

Penny Wright - SA - She spent 20 years working as a lawyer. - No problem dealing with a Carbon Tax

Larissa Waters - Qld - Waters works as an Environmental Lawyer in a private firm - another Lawyer who will not be particularly affected by the Carbon Tax.

Adam Bandt - Vic - Prior to his election to parliament, Bandt was an industrial, labor relations and public interest lawyer living in Parkville. He was a partner at Slater and Gordon and is currently completing his PhD in law and politics from Monash University. His PhD thesis was "Work to Rule: Rethinking Marx, Pashukanis and Law". [3] At Murdoch University, Bandt was a student activist and member of the Left Alliance. At that time he has been quoted as calling the Greens a "bourgeois" party. - He wouldn't notice the Carbon Tax and recognises it will help to kill off the Middle Income class of people.


These Upper class Greens that insist on hitting us hard with a Carbon Tax can afford to say this, they are not the ones that will be hurt by it. This is the case for many of those that support this tax, most on good upper income wages. They do not care that the Middle income earners will be in a world of pain and IF the lower income earners really do receive compensation they will not be compensated for the increase in prices as the cost of living raises across the board.